New Bloom
New Bloom is an online magazine featuring radical perspectives on Taiwan and the Asia-Pacific, founded by a group of students and activists after the 2014 Sunflower Movement in Taiwan. We seek to provide a space that fosters political and intellectual transnational dialogues in the Left.
What you need to know
A crucial post-Sunflower debate over China-centric language learning has been rekindled in Taiwan.
By Brian Hioe
Concerns about Chinese attempts to subtly influence the Taiwanese education system are back in the news.
Reports last month indicated that Chinese language textbooks cowritten by China’s Fujian Normal University and Taiwan’s Chinese Classics Association are in use at 20 high schools in Taiwan, mostly concentrated in Taipei and Kaohsiung. These textbooks were approved last year by the National Academy for Education Research, with some warning that the aim of the textbooks was to subtly influence Taiwanese student’s perceptions of Taiwan and China through language learning, but they received little attention at the time. The project to produce these textbooks was a four-and-a-half year collaborative project, meaning that the project to write these textbooks has been a long-term effort.
Credit: Davidzh / Wikicommons
Language learning is oftentimes fraught political territory in Taiwan, with criticisms of the disproportionate focus on classical Chinese in language teaching despite its remoteness from contemporary vernacular language as it is used today in Taiwan. However, political actors in the Kuomintang (KMT)-aligned “pan-Blue” camp have historically called for the preservation of classical Chinese teaching in order to reinforce political claims that Taiwan is part of China. It should also not be surprising that language learning also necessarily engages with Taiwan and China’s respective political histories, seeing students are taught using historical literature from both Taiwan and China, and a specific notion of the political relation between Taiwan and China oftentimes creeps in with regards to what literature is chosen as required reading for students.
Groups supportive of the preservation of classical Chinese education and the current, China-centric curricula tend more often than not to be pan-Blue in nature and they lash out at calls to reduce the portion of classical Chinese used in contemporary Chinese language education as efforts by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-aligned “pan-Green” camp to realize the “desinicization” of Taiwan and push for “cultural Taiwanese independence.” It is not surprising either, that in opposition, many of those who call for a reduction in the proportion of classical Chinese taught in schools are pro-Taiwan organizations such as the Association for Taiwan Literature and Taiwanese literature scholars involved in cultural contestation over Taiwanese literature in recent years, such as Zhu Youxun (朱宥勳) and others.
But many have voiced concerns over future collaborative efforts between Fujian Normal University and the Chinese Classics Association, seeing as they intend to move next into the field of producing history textbooks. History textbooks would, of course, touch on questions of how Taiwan relates to China historically. Fujian Normal University and the Chinese Classics Association have stated that they intend to produce textbooks based on the “1992 Consensus”.
The plan to produce language textbooks was announced by Fujian Normal University vice president Zheng Jiajan at a conference in Taipei. Indeed, it is possible that collaborative efforts between Fujian Normal University and Taiwan’s Chinese Classics Association can be viewed as a “United Front” effort, given that the Chinese Classics Association hews towards the pan-Blue camp. On the other hand, Fujian Normal University may be viewed as a useful platform from which to conduct cross-strait outreach efforts because it is the Chinese province that is most geographically close to Taiwan and the majority of Taiwanese benshengren (本省人, people who came to Taiwan before World War II) descend from immigrants from Fujian.
Credit: Brian Hioe
Collaborative efforts between Fujian Normal University and the Chinese Classics Association to produce history textbooks do not surprise, seeing as pan-Blue political actors are currently engaged in efforts to push for what they see as the “restoration” of the teaching of Chinese history in Taiwan. Pan-blue political actors have a decided tendency to see the changes in the history curricula introduced during the Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) presidency as one of the key reasons why many younger Taiwanese identify exclusively with Taiwan and not China. As a result, pan-Blue political actors are currently organizing a push for a referendum that calls for the “restoration” of the teaching of Chinese history in schools.
At the same time, the issue is one that could trigger a widespread backlash. Apart from criticisms of the National Academy for Education Research for allowing the textbooks to be approved and accusations that the institution itself has pan-Blue sympathies in doing so, in summer 2015, protest over history textbooks with a China-centric view of history led high school students to occupy the Ministry of Education for a week. This event took place when former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was still in power and was a smaller-scale replay of the 2014 Sunflower Movement. We shall see if the issue continues to be a contentious one, then.
Read Next: OPINION: Taiwan’s International Schools Are a Deregulated Nightmare
The News Lens has been authorized to repost this article. The original post was published on New Bloom here. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of The News Lens.
Editor: Nick Aspinwall (@Nick1Aspinwall)
If you enjoyed this article and want to receive more like it in your news feed, please be sure to like our Facebook page below.
